Massey v. Lumpkin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• apprising adverse possessor of claim to disputed area by demand letter does not disturb possession without required entry under Connecticut statute
• property in corporate name was, in reality, private property for purposes of homestead exemption from judgment creditors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).