Massey, Michael v. Johnson, Mable

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a failure to prove one essential element “necessarily renders all other facts immaterial”
• holding that a failure to prove one essential element “necessarily renders all other facts immaterial”
• holding that a failure to prove one essential element “necessarily renders all other facts immaterial”
• holding that a failure to prove one essential element “necessarily renders all other facts immaterial”
• stating that “to give rise to liability, the retaliatory harassment need not be extreme.”
• noting that for courts to consider retaliation to be a motivating factor, retaliation need not be the but-for or only factor, retaliation just needs to be a factor in the defendant’s actions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).