Skip to main content
· 12/15/2011

Massachusetts v. ETrade Access, Inc.

Citations

  • 834 F. Supp. 2d 43
  • 25 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1233
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 144452
  • 2011 WL 6301217

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • granting summary judgment to employer on disparate treatment claim based on plaintiff’s inability to present any circumstantial evidence of discriminatory animus sufficient to establish pretext
  • “It is not 13 the Court’s role to make arguments for any party.”
  • “It is not 27 the Court’s role to make arguments for any party.”
  • “It is not the Court’s role to make arguments for any party.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gorton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.