Skip to main content
· 4/13/2009

Massachusetts v. Bartel (In Re Bartel)

Citations

  • 403 B.R. 173
  • 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 1122
  • 2009 WL 982797

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that sub stantial segment of population requirement satisfied where the Commonwealth of Massachusetts sought to protect only 20 homeowners
  • in case involving debtor who defrauded consumers, holding that “[t]he Commonwealth has an interest beyond that of each individual in ensuring that those who do business within this state comport with a basic level of fairness in all their dealings”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Joel B. Rosenthal

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.