Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency v. Evora

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that confirmed plan is considered res judicata as to claim valuation determinations
• “While section 1329(a)(1) provides that a plan may be modified to increase or reduce the amount of payments[,] it does not state that the plan may be modified to increase or reduce the amount of the secured claim.”
• “The Code does not provide a second bite at the apple”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).