Massachusetts Casualty Insurance Company v. Glen A. Harmon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, when a case concerns the validity of an entire insurance policy, future legal certainty that the amount has been met. Gafford v. Gen. Elec. Co., 997 F.2d 150, 157 (6th Cir. 1993), abrogated by Hertz Corp. v. Friend, 559 U.S. 77 (2010
• stating that future potential benefits may not be taken into consideration when computing the amount in controversy where the controversy concerns “merely the extent of the insurer’s obligation with respect to disability benefits and not the validity of the policy”
• “[F]uture potential benefits may not be taken into (continued...

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).