Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. Hussmann Refrigerator Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding appeal was not equitably moot even though the appellant did not seek a stay
• concluding Entz-White precluded a creditor’s argument “that a plan intended to nullify the consequences of a default (thereby avoiding the higher post- default interest rate) does not meet the purposes of the Bankruptcy Code”
• rejecting the argument “that a plan intended to nullify the consequences of a default (thereby avoiding the 25 higher post-default interest rate) does not meet the purposes of the Bankruptcy Code”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).