Skip to main content

Mason v. State

Citations

  • 225 Md. App. 467
  • 126 A.3d 129
  • 2015 Md. App. LEXIS 156

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying the two-witness rule and determining that there was sufficient evidence to sustain Mason’s conviction for perjury where the State introduced both direct and circumstantial evidence
  • permitting video to independently corroborate the falsity of defendant’s statement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eyler, Woodward, Thieme

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.