Mason v. Pewabic Mining Co.
Citations
- 153 U.S. 361
- 14 S. Ct. 847
- 38 L. Ed. 745
- 1894 U.S. LEXIS 2189
Syllabus
<p>This court has no jurisdiction over an appeal from a judgment of a Circuit Court denying the application of counsel for a solicitor’s allowance out of a fund realized from a sale made under direction of that court in execution of a mandate of this court, the appeal being taken after July 1, 1891, and not being taken under the provisions of section 5 of the Judiciary Act of March 3, 1891, c. 517.</p> <p>When a mandate of this court has been misconstrued or disregarded by a Circuit Court, the'proper remedy now is by mandamus; but in this case the Circuit Court was at liberty to consider the application for an allowance, and its action in that regard was open to review in the Circuit Court of Appeals.</p>
Judges: Fuller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re Sanford Fork & Tool Co.Supreme Court· 1895-12-23· cited 544×
- Bissell Carpet-Sweeper Co. v. Goshen Sweeper Co.Sixth Circuit· 1896-03-05· cited 53×
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. ShaneSupreme Court· 1895-04-01· cited 46×
- Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. SlatterySeventh Circuit· 1939-02-22· cited 33×
- In re Michigan Cent. R. Co.Sixth Circuit· 1903-07-20· cited 23×
- Ohio Oil Co. v. ThompsonEighth Circuit· 1941-06-23· cited 22×
- The New YorkSixth Circuit· 1900-10-13· cited 21×
- Ruggles v. PattonSixth Circuit· 1906-02-20· cited 17×
- Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. SlatterySeventh Circuit· 1938-08-09· cited 11×
- The New YorkSixth Circuit· 1901-04-02· cited 8×
- Christoffel v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1954-05-13· cited 7×
- Talbot v. MasonSixth Circuit· 1903-07-21· cited 4×
- Ex parte MansfieldD.C. Circuit· 1897-12-08· cited 1×
- James v. Central Trust Co.Fourth Circuit· 1901-05-07
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lau Ow Bew v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1892-03-14· cited 221×
- Aspen Mining & Smelting Co. v. BillingsSupreme Court· 1893-10-23· cited 133×
- In Re ClaasenSupreme Court· 1891-05-11· cited 97×
- City Bank of Fort Worth v. HunterSupreme Court· 1894-03-19· cited 38×
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court· 1893-05-01· cited 28×
- Voorhees v. John T. Noye Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court· 1894-01-03· cited 26×
- National Exchange Bank of Baltimore v. PetersSupreme Court· 1892-04-18· cited 20×
- Wauton v. DeWolfSupreme Court· 1891-12-21· cited 7×
- Ogden v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1893-04-03· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.