Mason v. Merced Irr. Dist.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “assum[ing] the correctness” of district court’s 20 application of one-year limitations period to Section 970 claim
• “assum[ing] the correctness” of district court’s application of one-year limitations period to Section 970 claim
• “Under California law, a breach of 17 contract claim requires a showing of appreciable and actual damage.”
• “Under California law, a breach of contract claim requires a 20 showing of appreciable and actual damage.”
• independent agreement regarding job security inconsistent with portions of collective bargaining agreement governing layoffs; collective bargaining agreement controls
• “[W]here the position in dispute is covered by the CBA, the CBA controls and any claims seeking to enforce the terms of [an agreement] are preempted.” (second alteration in original) (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).