Mason v. Mason

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• had it been testatrix's purpose to restrict the option to her son in person to the exclusion of his family, it would have been the easy and natural thing for her to express herself in unequivocal terms

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Estate of Niehenke
  Washington Supreme Court· 1991-10-31· cited 51×
• In Re the Estate of Lemke
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1974-03-27· cited 17×
• Tuecke v. Tuecke
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1964-12-15· cited 15×
• Fischer v. Mills
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1957-10-15· cited 9×
• In the Matter of Estate of Niehenke
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1990-05-31· cited 6×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• McAllister v. McAllister
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1918-04-01· cited 25×
• Application of the State to Subject Property of Said Estate to a Collateral Inheritance Tax v. Kiler
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1903-10-20· cited 16×
• Cebrian v. De Laveaga
  California Supreme Court· 1898-01-21· cited 11×