Skip to main content
· 2/9/2006

Mason v. Cuisenaire

Citations

  • 128 P.3d 446
  • 122 Nev. 43
  • 122 Nev. Adv. Rep. 6
  • 2006 Nev. LEXIS 8

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that a court may, but is not required to, address constitutional arguments raised for the first time on appeal
  • recognizing that the court may, but is not required to, address constitutional arguments raised for the first time on appeal
  • recognizing that the court may, but is not required to, address constitutional arguments raised for the first time on appeal
  • recognizing that a court may, but is not required to, address constitutional arguments raised for the first time on appeal
  • recognizing that the custodial parent may recover child support for the period of separation before the divorce under NRS 125B.030
  • recognizing an implicit finding that a judgment was entitled to domestication where express findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding the party's arguments against domestication were absent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Parraguirre, Rose, Becker, Gibbons, Maupin, Douglas, Hardesty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.