Mason v. Coca-Cola Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the claim that Diet Coke Plus contained vitamins and minerals was true and that the plaintiffs failed to allege what further expectations they may have had or how those expectations were not met
• applying the same five elements to a New Jersey intentional misrepresentation claim
• finding FDA regulations as to food and drug not applicable to consideration of a CFA claim because “only a violation of regulations enacted under N.J.S.A. 56:8–4 can serve as a basis for a claim of an unlawful practice under the NJCFA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).