Skip to main content
· 12/16/1929

Mason & Hanger Co. v. Burnam

Citations

  • 36 F.2d 330
  • 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 2163

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Parallel proceedings, one judicial, one arbitral, are governed . . . by the normal rules for parallel-proceedings abstention.”
  • “The only purpose that we can ascribe to the word ‘issue’ in section 3 is to enable litigation to be stayed pending arbitration even if only one of the issues in the litigation is subject to an agreement to arbitrate.”
  • “In a suit ‘upon any issue referable to arbitration under an agreement in writing for such arbitration,’ the court, upon determining that the issue involved in the suit is indeed referable to arbitration, shall upon application of a party stay the judicial proceeding.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Knappen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.