· 1/18/2011
Mason & Dixon Intermodal v. Lapmaster International LLC
Citations
- 632 F.3d 1056
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 903
- 2011 WL 135084
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the court applies state substantive law to state law claims based on supplemental jurisdiction
- holding the district court correctly applied California Code of 15 Civil Procedure section 877 as state substantive law to resolve motion to dismiss pursuant to good 16 faith settlement
- holding the district court correctly applied California Code of Civil Procedure 3 section 877 as state substantive law to resolve motion to dismiss pursuant to good faith 4 settlement
- holding the district court correctly applied California Code of Civil Procedure 2 section 877 as state substantive law to resolve motion to dismiss pursuant to good faith 3 settlement
- explaining that federal courts sitting in diversity apply state substantive law
- courts sitting in diversity 22 apply Sections 877 and 877.6, as substantive California law, to good faith settlement 23 determinations
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tashima, Silverman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.