Skip to main content
· 1/18/2011

Mason & Dixon Intermodal v. Lapmaster International LLC

Citations

  • 632 F.3d 1056
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 903
  • 2011 WL 135084

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the court applies state substantive law to state law claims based on supplemental jurisdiction
  • holding the district court correctly applied California Code of 15 Civil Procedure section 877 as state substantive law to resolve motion to dismiss pursuant to good 16 faith settlement
  • holding the district court correctly applied California Code of Civil Procedure 3 section 877 as state substantive law to resolve motion to dismiss pursuant to good faith 4 settlement
  • holding the district court correctly applied California Code of Civil Procedure 2 section 877 as state substantive law to resolve motion to dismiss pursuant to good faith 3 settlement
  • explaining that federal courts sitting in diversity apply state substantive law
  • courts sitting in diversity 22 apply Sections 877 and 877.6, as substantive California law, to good faith settlement 23 determinations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tashima, Silverman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.