Eleventh Circuit· 2/24/2006

Mason Brown v. John Snow

Citations

440 F.3d 1259
2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 4457
87 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,379
97 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 951
2006 WL 431721

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that filing a civil complaint before the end of the 180-day waiting period alone was not a failure to exhaust
holding that the district court “correctly refused to address” a potential but not pleaded claim
holding that the district court correctly refused to address an allegation of retaliation that the plaintiff discussed in his deposition because he never amended his complaint to include the claim
noting that the adverse employment action standard is the same for both retaliation and direct discrimination claims under Title VII
holding that a Title VII retaliation claim was not properly before the court because, although the plaintiff “had not been fired when he filed his complaint, [the plaintiff] never amended his complaint to include a claim of retaliation based on his termination”
applying the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals' \good faith effort\ standard but finding insufficient record information to determine whether plaintiff exhausted administrative remedies

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carnes, Hull, Pryor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.