Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 6/3/1977

Masland v. Bachman

Citations

374 A.2d 517
473 Pa. 280
1977 Pa. LEXIS 714

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

where specialized agency is entrusted with implementing act, agency's interpretation of act is \entitled to significant weight\
“[A] change in the language of a statute ordinarily indicates a change in legislative intent.”
“A change in the language of a statute ordinarily indicates a change in legislative intent.”
“[A] change in the language of a statute ordinarily indicates a change in legislative intent.”
where specialized agency is entrusted with implementing act, agency’s interpretation of act is “entitled to significant weight”
“A change in the language of a statute ordinarily indicates a change in legislative intent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Nix, Manderino

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

84 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Masland v. Bachman

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Masland v. Bachman
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-07-09· cited 2×

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.