Maskill v. Cummins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the striking of a qualified juror does “not constitute a reversible abuse of discretion” unless there is “evidence of systematic exclusion (e.g., on the basis of race or gender) that undermines the fairness of the entire jury process”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).