Skip to main content
· 10/7/2013

Masferrer v. United States

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 152
  • 187 L. Ed. 2d 39
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3179
  • 571 U.S. 825
  • 2013 WL 2491066
  • 2013 U.S. LEXIS 5367

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • collecting post- Dirks cases recognizing a \wide variety of personal benefits\ varying from the tipper and tippee being \friends from college\ to the tipper receiving \live lobsters\ from the tippee
  • \[T]he personal benefit element can be met by evidence that the tipper's disclosure of inside information was intended to benefit the tippee.\
  • duty of trust and confidence established by a 5 consulting contract prohibiting disclosure of confidential information
  • “[T]he personal benefit element can be met by evidence that the tipper’s disclosure of inside information was intended to benefit the tippee.”
  • \The tipper's intention to benefit the tippee proves a breach of fiduciary duty because it demonstrates that the tipper improperly used inside information for personal ends and thus lacked a legitimate corporate purpose.\
  • “A firm’s confidential information belongs to the firm itself, and an insider entrusted with it has a fiduciary duty to use it only for firm purposes.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.