Mascarenas v. Kennedy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “a claimant [has] the burden of establishing his right to compensation by a preponderance of the evidence” and that a court cannot “award compensation where the requisite proof is absent”
• judgment not reversed even though erroneous rule applied, in worker’s compensation case, where evidence substantially supported the findings without applying the erroneous rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).