Masb-Seg property/casualty Pool, Inc v. Metalux

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the trial court properly excluded expert testimony regarding evidence that was not preserved,” without distinguishing between physical and photographic evidence
• stating that “[t]he economic loss doctrine provides that where a plaintiff seeks to recover for economic loss caused by a defective product purchased for commercial purposes, the exclusive remedy is provided by the UCC”
• distinguishing “direct and consequential losses” within the parties’ contemplation, which are subject to contract negotiation and remedies, from unforeseeable safety hazards that are resolvable in tort
• involving the sale of a light fixture

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).