Masayesva v. Zah

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the availability of compulsory process did not weigh in favor of transfer where it was inevitable that witnesses would have to travel more than 100 miles
• holding “that three of the nine construction projections were located in the Western District of Texas is sufficient to satisfy the ‘substantiality’ requirement ”
• stating that the substantiality requirement under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2) does not require that the selected venue be the best venue but rather one that has substantial connection to the claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).