· 7/24/2003
Marzullo v. Crosman Corp.
Citations
- 289 F. Supp. 2d 1337
- 2003 WL 22462482
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, “as a matter of law,” there could “be no products liability action on” the plaintiff’s negligence claim without a “defect or unreasonably dangerous condition”
- applying the same rules to a products liability negligence claim involving a BB gun
- “The difference between negligent failure to warn and failure to warn under a strict liability theory is that a prima facie case of strict liability failure to warn does not require a showing of negligence.” (marks omitted)
- analyzing a design- defect claim under Florida law
- analyzing a design-defect claim under Florida law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Whittemore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.