Skip to main content
· 7/24/2003

Marzullo v. Crosman Corp.

Citations

  • 289 F. Supp. 2d 1337
  • 2003 WL 22462482

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, “as a matter of law,” there could “be no products liability action on” the plaintiff’s negligence claim without a “defect or unreasonably dangerous condition”
  • applying the same rules to a products liability negligence claim involving a BB gun
  • “The difference between negligent failure to warn and failure to warn under a strict liability theory is that a prima facie case of strict liability failure to warn does not require a showing of negligence.” (marks omitted)
  • analyzing a design- defect claim under Florida law
  • analyzing a design-defect claim under Florida law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Whittemore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.