Skip to main content
· 6/6/2005

Maryland Transit Administration v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.

Citations

  • 372 F. Supp. 2d 478
  • 2005 WL 1322742

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that Sverdrup is binding in the circuit but expressing view that it “is a candidate for reconsideration”
  • acknowledging the binding nature of Sverdrup but stating that the Fourth Circuit “is very likely to reconsider that holding” in light of the Second Circuit’s decision in Photopaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.