Maryland State Department of Personnel v. Sealing

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “there was substantial evidence from which a reasoning mind reasonably could have concluded” that a correctional officer’s conduct “was wantonly offensive and constituted sufficient cause for [his] removal from State service”
• concluding that “there was substantial evidence from which a reasoning mind reasonably could have concluded” that a correctional officer’s conduct “was wantonly offensive and constituted sufficient cause for [his] removal from State service”
• “We see no reason why the refusal of these appellants to leave the premises after having been requested to do so was not wanton in that their conduct was in utter disregard for the rights of others.” (quoting Griffin v. State, 171 A.2d 717, 720 (Md. 1961

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).