Skip to main content
· 12/18/1974

Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. Rosenberg

Citations

  • 329 A.2d 106
  • 273 Md. 351
  • 1974 Md. LEXIS 711

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • new inquiry into guilt of attorney for disciplinary purposes not mandated when guilt established beyond reasonable doubt at criminal trial observing due process
  • “due process does not require a second opportunity for the lawyer to refute the criminal charges”
  • \due process does not require a second opportunity for the lawyer to refute the criminal charges\
  • \due process does not require a second opportunity for the lawyer to refute the criminal charges\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Digges, Eldridge, Murphy, O'Donnell, Singley, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.