Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. Kerr

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a post-conviction proceeding in Maryland “does not constitute a part of the original criminal cause, but is an independent and collateral civil inquiry into the validity of the conviction and sentence”
• explaining that a post-conviction proceeding in Maryland does not constitute a part of the original criminal cause, but is an independent and collateral civil inquiry into the validity of the conviction and sentence
• explaining that a post-conviction proceeding in Maryland does not constitute a part of the original criminal cause, but is an independent and collateral civil inquiry into the validity of the conviction and sentence
• observing that a postconviction proceeding is “an independent and collateral civil inquiry into the validity of the conviction and sentence,” not “a part of the original criminal cause”
• observing that a postconviction proceeding is “an independent and collateral civil inquiry into the validity of the conviction and sentence,” not “a part of the original criminal cause”
• stating that post-conviction proceedings in Maryland do “not constitute a part of the original criminal cause, but is an independent and collateral civil inquiry into the validity of the conviction and sentence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).