Maryland Radiological Society, Inc. v. Health Services Cost Review Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing right to intervention ruling under non-deferential standard, but permissive intervention under abuse of discretion standard
• noting that all relevant circumstances should be taken into account
• “In the absence of Maryland authority, the similarity of Maryland Rule 208 [now Maryland Rule 2-214] and Federal Rule 24 makes the decisions of the federal courts interpreting their rule of considerable precedental value in construing our rule.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).