Skip to main content
· 6/5/1973

Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning Commission v. City of Rockville

Citations

  • 305 A.2d 122
  • 269 Md. 240
  • 1973 Md. LEXIS 819

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • indicating that one who “owns any property located within sight or sound of the subject property” is aggrieved
  • indicating that one who “owns any property located within sight or sound of the subject property” is aggrieved
  • noting that entities that did not “own property within sight or sound of the subject property [had] no special interest or damage to give either of them the status of an aggrieved party----”
  • suit brought to challenge statutory validity of municipality’s rezoning of annexed land presented issue for determination by declaratory judgment
  • “Neither the Commission nor the County owns any property located within sight or sound of the subject property and have no special interest or damage to give either of them the status of an ‘aggrieved party,’ necessary to present an appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barnes, McWilliams, Singley, Smith, Levine

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.