Maryland Environmental Trust v. Gaynor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring a plaintiff to show, among other things, that they “relied on the misrepresentation and had the right to rely on it”
• in negotiating terms of environmental easement, clear language of letter to plaintiff precluded reliance on earlier, inconsistent statements
• in negotiating terms of environmental easement, clear language of letter to plaintiff precluded reliance on earlier, inconsistent statements
• This Court held that the plaintiffs failed to establish a claim for constructive fraud where “[t]here was no fiduciary or confidential relationship existing between” the parties; thus, the defendant “had no duty to” take a certain action.
• This Court held that the plaintiffs failed to establish a claim for constructive fraud where “[t]here was no fiduciary or confidential relationship existing between” the parties; thus, the defendant “had no duty to” take a certain action.
• “A conservation easement is a legal agreement between a landowner and MET[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).