Maryland Department of Human Resources, and Ruth Massinga, Secretary v. Department of Health and Human Services, and Margaret Heckler, Secretary

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting argument that court should apply “contractual principles” to federal-grant program, and explaining that grant programs are instead “governed by the applicable statute[s] and implementing regulations”
• rejecting argument that court should apply “contractual principles” to federal grant program, and explaining that grant programs are instead “governed by the applicable statute[s] and implementing regulations”
• rejecting argument, that court should .apply “contractual principles” to federal grant program, and explaining that grant programs are instead “governed by the applicable statute[s] and implementing regulations”
• declining to infer a “contractual” relationship in the Aid to Families with Dependent Chil- dren program, 42 U.S.C. § 601 et seq., a “grant in aid” pro- gram

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).