Skip to main content
· 6/6/2000

Maryland Casualty Co. v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

Citations

  • 97 Cal. Rptr. 2d 374
  • 81 Cal. App. 4th 1082
  • 2000 Daily Journal DAR 6917
  • 2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 511

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[ejquitable subrogation allows an insurer that paid coverage or defense costs to be placed in the insured’s position to pursue a full recovery from another insurer who was primarily responsible for the loss”
  • explaining that equitable contribution of defense costs equalizes a common burden shared by primary insurers
  • explaining that circuit court has \broad discretion\ in determining how to properly allocate defense costs
  • explaining that circuit court has \broad discretion\ in determining how to properly allocate defense costs
  • explaining that equitable contribution of defense costs equalizes a common burden shared by primary insurers
  • considering both liability coverage and defense costs as relevant costs for purposes of burden-shifting through equitable subrogation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.