Skip to main content
· 6/24/1998

Maryland Casualty Co. v. Nationwide Insurance

Citations

  • 76 Cal. Rptr. 2d 113
  • 65 Cal. App. 4th 21
  • 98 Daily Journal DAR 7115
  • 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4996
  • 1998 Cal. App. LEXIS 572

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining'that “[a]n insurer seeking equitable contribution need only demonstrate another insurer covered the same risk and failed to pay its share of the loss”
  • “An insurer must defend any action that asserts a claim potentially seeking damages within the coverage of the policy.”
  • “[Obligee] was sued for construction defects at the project. [Obligee] tendered defense of the underlying action to its own insurers ... as well as to [Principal's insurer] under the terms of the [contract].”
  • additional insured covered “only to the extent [the additional insured] is held liable for [the named insured’s] acts or omissions arising out of and in the course of operations”
  • “[E]ach insurer has independent standing to assert a cause of action 26 against its coinsurers for equitable contribution when it has undertaken the defense or 27 indemnification of the common insured.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.