Skip to main content
· 6/1/1994

Maryland Casualty Co. v. Lorkovic

Citations

  • 641 A.2d 924
  • 100 Md. App. 333
  • 1994 Md. App. LEXIS 79

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the party opposing summary judgment must offer \`evidence upon which the [court] could reasonably find [in his favor]'\
  • stating that the party opposing summary judgment must offer “ ‘evidence upon which the [court] could reasonably find [in his favor]’ ”
  • “... appellants’ trial memorandum and joint appellate brief present a detailed analysis of [the legal issue].”
  • “As a general rule, appellate courts will not ordinarily undertake to sustain the judgment by ruling on another ground, not ruled upon by the trial court, if the alternative ground is one as to which the trial court had a discretion to deny summary judgment.” (Cleaned up)
  • “As a general rule, appellate courts will not ordinarily undertake to sustain the judgment by ruling on another ground, not ruled upon by the trial court, if the alternative ground is one as to which the trial court had a discretion to deny summary judgment.” (Cleaned up)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bishop, Davis, Motz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.