Skip to main content
· 3/7/1966

Maryland Casualty Co. v. Baldwin

Citations

  • 357 F.2d 338

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “[b]ecause of the delicate nature of the power to initiate surveillance applications,” Congress took care to ensure that “the implementation” of this authority “was reserved to” high-level leadership officials within the Department
  • Title III does not violate Fourth Amendment
  • authorization by Executive Assistant insufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.