· 3/7/1966
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Baldwin
Citations
- 357 F.2d 338
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “[b]ecause of the delicate nature of the power to initiate surveillance applications,” Congress took care to ensure that “the implementation” of this authority “was reserved to” high-level leadership officials within the Department
- Title III does not violate Fourth Amendment
- authorization by Executive Assistant insufficient
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.