Maryland Automobile Insurance Fund v. Sun Cab Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that an issue “squarely presented for resolution in the tort action[ ],” was appropriately refused consideration in a declaratory judgment action
• noting that an issue “squarely presented for resolution in the tort actionf]” was properly refused consideration in a declaratory judgment action
• “[T]here was no facial inconsistency between the stated purpose ‘of exempting certain vehicles . . . from certain required primary coverage insurance provisions’ and the effect of excluding taxicabs from PIP and UM coverage.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).