Maryland Automobile Insurance Fund v. Perry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[t]he thrust of the 1972 law was to extend ... insurance protection, especially a limited amount of primary, no-fault benefits for wage loss and basic medical expenses.”
• “[Section] 19 of the Insurance Article focuses on automobile liability insurance carriers and their insureds, not HMOs or other insurance carriers.”
• waiver provision added to statute in light of escalating cost of PIP coverage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).