Mary W. HINES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the record should “build an accurate and logical bridge from the evidence to the [ALJ’s] conclusion” (quoting Clifford v. Apfel, 227 F.3d 863, 872 (7th Cir. 2000))
• remanding to ALJ for failure to consider the combined effects of the claimant’s impairments, including “the negative impact of her medication” even though no impairment on its own was sufficient to find that claimant was disabled
• “The ALJ must make a particularized finding on the effect of the combination of impairments.” (emphasis added)
• “[I]n determining whether an individual’s impairments are of sufficient severity to prohibit basic work-related activities, an ALJ must consider the combined effect of a claimant’s impairments.”
• “[I]n determining whether an individual’s impairments are of sufficient severity to prohibit basic work-related activities, an ALJ must coneicer the combined effect of a claimant’s impairments.”
• “{I]n determining whether an individual’s impairments are of sufficient severity to prohibit basic work related activities, an ALJ must consider the combined effect of a claimant’s impairments.”’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).