Mary Vela AKA Mary Nava v. Shafaii Investments Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that substantial evidence supported the Workers’ Compensation Commission’s decision that the employee suffered a compensable injury to her right breast implant in the course of her employment
• finding that substantial evidence supported the Workers' Compensation Commission's decision that the employee suffered a compensable injury to her right breast implant in the course of her employment
• finding that substantial evidence supported the Workers' Compensation Commission's decision that the employee suffered a compensable injury to her right breast implant in the course of her employment
• adopting this court’s holding in Stephens Truck Lines v. Millican, 58 Ark. App. 275, 950 S.W.2d 472 (1997)
• medical evidence on the issue of causation is not required in every case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).