Mary Ruth Smith v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of Social Security

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the ALJ’s decision must be sustained even if the reviewing court disagrees so long as it is supported by substantial evidence and that “the duty to resolve conflicts in the evidence rests with the ALJ”
• “The duty to resolve conflicts in the evidence rests with the ALJ, not with a reviewing court.”
• “The duty to resolve conflicts in the evidence rests with the ALJ, not with a reviewing court.”
• “The duty to resolve conflicts in the evidence rests with the ALJ, not with a reviewing court.”
• “The duty to resolve conflicts in the evidence rests with the ALJ, not with a reviewing court.”
• “The duty to resolve conflicts in the evidence rests with the ALJ, not with a reviewing court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).