Mary Ruffin v. Tri County Auto Salvage

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting International Salt's claim that it had to control the supply of salt to protect its leased machines in the absence of proof that competitors could not supply salt of equal quality
• rejecting International Salt’s claim that it had to control the supply of salt to protect its leased machines in the absence of proof that competitors could not supply salt of equal quality
• tying violates section 1 of the Sherman Act and section 3 of the Clayton Act
• noting purported benefit can be achieved by 74 EPIC GAMES, INC. V. APPLE, INC. implementing quality control for machine consumables
• tying violates section 1 of the Sherman Act and section 3 of the Clayton Act
• tying violates section 1 of the Sherman Act and section 3 of the Clayton Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).