Mary R. v. B. & R. CORP.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that board had \standing [to collaterally attack gag order] based on its interest in fulfilling its statutory obligations to supervise and regulate the practice of medicine in this state and to investigate allegations of physician misconduct\
• finding that court order prohibiting settling parties in civil suit involving allegations that doctor sexually abused patient from discussing allegations with investigators from agency charged with regulating medical profession violates public policy and will not be enforced

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).