Skip to main content
· 5/11/2015

Mary Metter v. United States

Citations

  • 785 F.3d 1227
  • 2015 WL 2167168

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the decision whether to -6- install guardrails near a fishing area was susceptible to policy analysis
  • holding decision not to replace a guardrail in part due to an effort to save money was protected by the discretionary function exception
  • applying exception to decision to remove guardrails from recreational area, which balanced safety versus timing and costs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riley, Loken, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.