· 5/11/2015
Mary Metter v. United States
Citations
- 785 F.3d 1227
- 2015 WL 2167168
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the decision whether to -6- install guardrails near a fishing area was susceptible to policy analysis
- holding decision not to replace a guardrail in part due to an effort to save money was protected by the discretionary function exception
- applying exception to decision to remove guardrails from recreational area, which balanced safety versus timing and costs
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Riley, Loken, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.