Mary Margaret Smith v. Happy State Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that Atcheson supported a finding of “only a de minimis effect on interstate commerce, including a de minimis effect that was probable rather than actual” (citing Atcheson, 94 F.3d at 1243)
• “The interstate nexus requirement is satisfied ‘by proof of a probable or potential impact’ on interstate commerce. The government need not show that a defendant’s acts actually affected interstate commerce.” (internal 3 citation omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).