Skip to main content
· 12/10/1985

Mary M. MARES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John O. MARSH, Secretary of the Army, Defendant-Appellee

Citations

  • 777 F.2d 1066
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 24932
  • 39 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 35,840
  • 40 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 858

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the extent of control exercised by an employer is the most important factor in determining if an employment relationship exists
  • explaining that just because certain grocery baggers who worked on military base had to comply with certain Army regulations concerning dress and conduct, that was “not enough to make them employees of the Army”
  • explaining that just because certain grocery baggers who worked on military base had to comply with certain Army regulations concerning dress and conduct, that was “not enough to make them employees of the Army”
  • “The mere fact that [grocery] baggers must comply with certain Army regulations [affecting dress and conduct] is not enough to make them employees of the Army”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Politz, Garwood, Jolly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.