Mary Joyce ZBLEWSKI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard S. SCHWEIKER, Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that when the ALJ fails to mention evidence, it is unclear whether it was considered and not credited or ignored, making meaningful appellate review impossible
• finding that it is not “merely helpful for the ALJ to articulate reasons for crediting or rejecting particular sources of evidence;” rather, “it is absolutely essential for meaningful appellate review.”
• finding error when ALJ fails to mention relevant evidence because “the reviewing court cannot tell if significant probative evidence was not credited or simply ignored.”
• finding error because the court “cannot tell if significant probative evidence was not credited or simply ignored”
• finding error when the ALJ fails to mention relevant evidence because “the reviewing court cannot tell if significant probative evidence was not credited or simply ignored.”
• decision of AU constituting the Secretary’s final decision failed to explain why he rejected certain evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).