Skip to main content
· 1/15/1985

Mary J. MILES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. M.N.C. CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee

Citations

  • 750 F.2d 867
  • 17 Fed. R. Serv. 393
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 27531
  • 36 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 34,953
  • 36 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1289

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an employer’s vague, subjective reasons for the challenged employment action may be insufficient because they “do not allow a reasonable opportunity for rebuttal”
  • noting that lack of preexisting criteria tends to weaken the value of a subjective evaluation
  • “[S]ubjective and vague criteria may be insufficient reasons given by an employer for its failure to [ ]hire because such criteria do not allow a reasonable opportunity for rebuttal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Godbold, Johnson, Clark

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.