Mary G. Yang v. Farmers New World Life Ins.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that warrantless, long-term pole camera surveillance of the defendant’s partially-enclosed carport was not a violation of the Fourth Amendment—even if the carport constituted the curtilage of his apartment
• upholding use of pole camera because “the area surveilled by the pole camera was readily accessible from a public vantage point”
• “[E]very curtilage determination is distinctive and stands or falls on its own unique set of facts.” (quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).