Skip to main content
· 11/22/1996

Mary Ellen Jannsen v. Judith v. Condo, Director of Albany County Rape Crisis Center, and County of Albany

Citations

  • 101 F.3d 14
  • 12 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 399
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 30236

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that probationary county employee did not have property interest employment or in any employment procedure
  • “Where there is no property interest in the employment, there can be no property interest in the procedures that follow from the employment.”
  • “Where there is no property interest in the employment, there can be no property interest in the procedures that follow from the employment.”
  • “This section does not mandate the employer to grant a leave of absence and a corresponding hearing, but rather permits the procedure.”
  • “The dispositive question is whether the testimony will ‘assist 15 the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue,’ not whether the 16 testimony satisfies the plaintiff’s burden on the ultimate issue at trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Winter, Altimari, Walker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.