Skip to main content
· 3/12/1986

Mary E. Hammond, Individually and Mary E. Hammond as She is the of the Estate of Charles E. Hammond v. United States

Citations

  • 786 F.2d 8
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 22921
  • 54 U.S.L.W. 2474

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • failing to allege a suspect class, plaintiffs’ equal protection argument fails on same basis as due pro cess analysis
  • upholding application of statute substituting the United States as defendant in nuclear testing litigation that operated to bar plaintiffs' recovery
  • upholding application of statute substituting the United States as defendant in nuclear testing litigation that operated to bar plaintiffs’ recovery
  • questioning the continued vitality of Coombes and Ettor because recent cases have retroactively abridged economic and real property rights without always carefully distinguishing these prior cases
  • “[W]e have no jurisdiction to consider a taking claim where the amount in controversy exceeds $10,000.”
  • “ This is not the first time Congress has substituted the government as defendant in a certain category of to rt suits and relegated plaintiffs to an FTCA remedy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bownes, Torruella, Hill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.